T-34, el vengador ruso.

Stalingrado!

03-11-2006

Eres mi enemigo Graf todo lo que venga de tu mano es veneno  ;D :D

NUNCA TE APOYAREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE  >:(

pd: se te quiere de este lado del caribe :D

MIGUEL WITTMAN

03-11-2006

Se estima que el total de tanques T-34 es de 84.070 unidades, más 13.170 piezas de artillería autopropulsada construidas utilizando chasis del T-34.

Fuente: wikipedia

Fug

25-11-2006

Creo que en Wikipedia sean pasado un poco, casi el doble.

Segun el Libro T-34 Panzer, de Karl Muller Verlag por cojer una referencia, de las muchas que hay, se produjeron de todos los modelos 53.552 carros, (aqui no incluyo los SU, siendo tu cifra bastante aproximada a los 12000 de que dispongo yo, hasta 1953).

No quiero empezar de nuevo el tema de discursiones, pero si no eran tan buenos en general, y los alemanes pusieron en servicio mas de 30.000 blindados. y de estos perdieron el 75 porciento en el Frente del Este, como se come esto, ejje. perdon. Lo que me impresiona es que siempre en las grandes batallas, o notan grandes se dice que los alemanes estaban en una inferioridad de 1/4 a 1/6, y si destruian tantos, cuadran las cuentas?

Bueno creo que esto es llover sobre mojado, quizas sea mejor no removerlo mas.

Produccion segun los Rusos, bueno, todo los datos se basan en ellos.

    • 110 (+2 prototipos),

1942 -  12527,

    • 15821,
    • 14648,
    • 12551,
  1. -  2707.

Si sumas, para el final de la guerra, se habian fabricado unos 47104, cuento mil de 1945, suponiendo que estos se enviaran al frente.

Para finales de 1946 se habian producido 60362 carros

Igor Shmelev 

Tecnologia y Armamento Diciembre de 1998

MIGUEL WITTMAN

25-11-2006

ENTRARÉ EN EL BAILE DE CIFRAS MÁS ADELANTE.

La superioridad numérica de los blindados rusos equilibraba la mejor calidad de los panzers alemanes desde mitad del 42. De ahí las proporciones de 4-5 carros rusos por cada uno alemán.

Fug

26-11-2006

Lo de la calidad tambien es un tema que se ha discutido mucho,

Para mi un T-34 tiene una excelente calidad, tanto de diseño como de fabricación, mayor a muchos carros alemanes, el acabado bueno, tampoco es tan exencial.

Que habia carros alemanes mejores, pues si, claro esta. Si cuentan los 1/5 por ejem contra estos mejores pues no se si sera asi.

Lo cierte es que un T-34 era mejor que cualquier carro de su peso o inferior aleman, habre versiones que equilibren, y habra momentos que alguno este momentaneamente al lado.

Como comprenderas los Panthers y Tigers estan un poco fuera de comparación, cosa que hay que tener en cuenta por que los T-34 debian luchar contra ellos. Lo cual hace que se les compare.

Que los rusos fabricaran mas de 50.000 chasis de T-34, simplemente me parece un logro incleible, para un pais en guerra, y que no estaba muy industrializado, si lo comparamos con otros paises, como Alemania, Francia o USA, y de estos no estaban en guerra en su pais, por lo que podian fabricar y trabajar mas tranquilamente, que eso es muy importante, con industrias bien instaladas, las poblacion con buen acceso a esta, energia, comunicaciones, etc. Todo esto es algo a tener muy en cuenta. Por ahi he leido, perdon, por aqui he lieido que los bombardeos estrategicos contra Alemania no afectaron a la industria, por que  el año 44 fue el de mayor produccion de esta. Supongo que estaras de acuerdo con migo de que esto no es asi.

Tambien hay que tener en cuenta que en la guerra industrial, alemania no estaba sola, tenia a media Europa trabajando para ella, desde Francia, Belgica, Checoslovaquia, Autria, Dinamarca, Suecia, Noruega, etc ... Y de las grandes cantidades de material canturado en buen estado. Los Alemanes no estaban, no solos, ni desarmados. Por algo la lucha fue tan grande.

De todos formas, esto no es que no reconozca y me guste, el merito de la Whermath, Panzerwaffe, etc.

Bueno fuera de comparaciones odiosas, el T-34 fue un excelente carro, al igual que Pz IV,V y VI o KV e IS, Esta es mi opinion personal, cual son mejores, pues dejemoslo al gusta si no queremos estar discutiendo toda la vida, jejeje.

Un saludo.

Fug

26-11-2006

Datos de los carros modelo T-34/85 fabricados, con los fabricas utilizadas.

Aqui vemos que para el final de la guerra se habian fabricado unos 11.000 carros de este modelo.

Factoria      1944    1945    1946  Total/factoria

№ 183      6585    7356    493      14434 

№ 112      3062    3255    1154      7471 

№ 174      1000    1940    1054      3994 

Total        10647    12551  2701      25899 

Carro medio T-34/85 Bronekollektsiya, 1999

M. Baryatinskiy

MIGUEL WITTMAN

26-11-2006

En al primera tabla de T-34 fabricados, el total es de 61.362.

En tu último mensaje, la suma correcta de los fabricados en esas 3 factorías, es de 23.198 solo de la versión T-34/85.

En mi mensaje te ponía que hasta mediados del 42, el T-34 si produjo el suficiente impacto en las líneas alemanas, como para replantearse totalmente el diseño y producción de carros de combate. Las versiones del Panzer IV desde la F2, ya podían destruir cualquier T-34. No digamos Tigres y Panteras. Dicho esto no es quitar ningún mérito al carro pero, las cantidades producidas permitían reponer con rapidez las bajas en combate cosa que los alemanes nunca pudieron hacer.

Fug

26-11-2006

Si, hasta hay llegamos, completamente de acuerdo.

Pues si, para 1947 se habian fabricado esos.

TITUS20050

26-11-2006

Los Rusos pudieron fabricar esa enorme cantidad de chasis T-34 debido a que bajo las directivas expresas de Stalin no bien comenzo la invasion a Rusia la mayor parte de la industria pesada y superpesada fue desarmada parte por parte y trasladada a Los Urales y los territorios de Siberia, lo que si fue algo inedito para un pais en Guerra por el enorme esfuerzo en hombre y logistica que significo este traslado.

Acontinuacion trascribo un articulo aparecido en http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php

donde se puede ver las ordenes de traslado y los diversos trabajos en el tanque de cada planta

T-34: Development History

T-34 Medium Tank

On May 5, 1940, the SNK USSR and Central Committee of the Communist Party signed a resolution "About manufacturing T-34 tanks in 1940", which says:

    "Attaching importance to equipping the Red Army with T-34 tanks, Council of the Peoples Commissars of the Soviet Union and Central Committee enacts:

    1. Require People's Commissar of the Machine-Building Comrade A.I.Likhachev:

    a. to produce 600 T-34 tanks in 1940:

    - by factory #183 - 500 tanks;

    - by Stalingradsky Tractor Factory - 100 tanks; and

    - by the following plan:

    Month VI VII VIII IX X XI XII

    Factory #183 10 20 30 80 115 120 125

    STZ - - - - 20 30 50

    b. to supply the whole program 1940 with diesel engines, for that purpose need to increase the V-2 production by factory #75 and manufacture 2,000 engines until the end of year..."

The very first T-34 and it's not armed yet. The Kharkov Factory. 1940

One of the first production T-34. 1940.(M.Baryatinsky)

Nevertheless this plan failed. Moreover, in summer 1940 the clouds were gathering over the T-34. The point is that two Pz-IIIs were bought in Germany and delivered to Kubinka for comparative tests. Soviet documentation does not clarify the exact modification of the Pz-III, in all cases it was named as "German T-III". The results were unfavourable for the Soviet T-34.

The T-34 was superior in terms of protection and firepower, but that's all. The Pz-III had a cosy three-man turret with a commander's cupola. Each crewman had an internal communication device at his service. In contrast, the T-34 had a very cramped two-man turret without a commander's cupola. Only the tank commander and the driver had internal communication.

The German tank had a very smooth motion and wasn't as noisy as the T-34: moving with maximum speed the Pz-III could be heard from 150-200 metres while the T-34 could be heard from 450-500 metres.

T-34 Model 1940 armed with the L-11 Main Gun.

T-34 armed with F-34 Main Gun on trials at the Gorokhovetsky proving ground. November, 1940. (M.Baryatinsky)

Soviet engineers were surprised by Pz-III's maximum speed. It was far superior and could run up to 69.7 km/h whereas the T-34's best result was 48.2 km/h. The BT-7, which was used as a standard model, could run on wheels at only 68.1 km/h. The report of those tests indicates that the Pz-III had better suspension, a high quality of German optics, a handy layout of ammunition and radio, and a reliable engine and transmission.

By those results the GABTU issued a summary document for Marshal G.I.Kulik, who affirmed it and ordered production of the T-34 to cease until improvements were made in all revealed defects and drawbacks. Large wrangles occurred. They've were cancelled by the personal meddling of Marshal K.E.Voroshilov: "Tank production must be continued with guaranty race of 1,000 km. Factory must develop a new tank - T-34M with improvements not only in its protection but also in running capabilities, so the new five-speed gearbox should be used."

Features of the T-34-76 of pre-war manufacturing 1940-1941.

At that time, M.I.Koshkin's health became worse as he was taken ill with single pneumonia in March 1940. On September 26, 1940, he died. A.A.Morozov became the Chief-engineer of the T-34 project.

Under his guidance the design bureau developed two variants of the T-34's modernisation. The first variant, named the A-41, was an attempt to improve most of defects without developing a new hull and drive train. It had a new three-man turret with a ring diameter of 1,700 mm (standard T-34 has a diameter of 1,420 mm). It was intended to rearm with the newest 76.2 mm F-34 gun, but due to unclear reasons that project was left on paper.

The second variant, named the A-43 and also known as the T-34M, was narrower, higher and longer than the production T-34.

The pre-war T-34 sunk in the swamp. Notice two boxes on the left belt. There are external fuel tanks of 33.5 litres each. (RGAKFD)

Simultaneously with the A-43 development, the Factory #183 continued mass production of the T-34. The first three tanks left the factory's gates by September 15, 1940. Until the end of year a total of 115 tanks were produced or 19% of the initially planned output. STZ didn't produce anything at all. All it could make were 23 half-assembled tanks.

Such a dramatic situation is quite understandable. The T-34 was a completely new tank, it required new technologies to be introduced successfully. Suppliers and manufacturers of various elements of the T-34 also needed time to adjust their technology bases. For example, Mariupol's turrets needed to be improved due to their inaccurate geometry and dimensions. In spite of simplified assembling techniques (for instance the frontal glacis was now welded from two armour plates), the T-34's production was still very difficult and as a result very expensive.

With enormous effort factory #75 could produce a V-2 engine that worked 150 hours without a failure! Such huge problems! A special test bench was built for verifying the correct and accurate dispersion of fuel and it's even feeding. All 12 atomisers of the V-2 were tested here. All atomisers, valves and needles were manually ground in.

T-34s of the first series were armed with the 76.2 mm L-11 gun. Mass production of L-11 guns was cancelled in 1939 in favour of the F-34 gun, so only about 400 T-34s were armed with the L-11. Tanks of all other modifications were armed with either the F-34 or its modernised variant the F-34M. Being more powerful than the L-11 or F-32, that gun was developed in 1939 by Grabin's design bureau. Initially it was supposed to be used for T-35 and T-28 tanks. On October 19, 1939, mounted on a T-28, the F-34 was tested on the Gorokhovetsky proving ground. From 20 to 23 November 1940 the F-34 was tested in a T-34 tank (the tests consisting of 1,000 shots). As a result of those tests the F-34 was recommended to be accepted for service.

Please notice! Despite being a commonly held view, not one T-34 was armed with the F-32 tank gun!

T-34 Model 1941 sunk in the swamp. (M.Baryatinsky)

At the same time, according to Order #76791 of the Minister of Defence (October 25, 1940), the first three T-34s were tested intensively on the Kubinka proving ground. A special commission revealed so many defects and drawbacks that it doubted the T-34's combat capabilities. Questions about cancellation of production and even abandonment of the whole project (!!!) were raised again.

Furthermore, some of the leaders of GABTU and Ministry of Defence maintained the idea that the T-50 should be the most mass produced tank, not the T-34.

Features of the T-34 of the Factory #112 "Krasnoye Sormovo".

Such a position wasn't accidental. As is known, on July 9, 1940 the Soviet High Command decided to form nine mechanised corps. By its organisation, each mechanised corps consisted of two tanks and one motorised division. Each tank division had 63 KV heavy tanks, 210 T-34 medium tanks and 102 light tanks (either BT or T-26 or both). Each motorised division had 275 light tanks (usually T-26). So the T-50 was intended to replace that large park of "outdated" vehicles. In February-March 1940, another 20 mechanised corps were formed using the same TO&E. Also many light tanks were needed to complete the tremendous number of Soviet rifle divisions (each rifle division had 16 tanks). So it is not too hard to calculate the entire number of medium tanks which should be produced to form all these corps: at least 4,620 medium tanks. At that time Soviet industry could produce only three T-34s.

T-34 Model 1941 of the 1st Guards Tank Brigade, Western Front, January 1942. (S.Zaloga)

Chief of the GABTU Y.N.Fedorenko and Chief of the GAU G.I.Kulik supported by the Commander of the Western Military District D.G.Pavlov, proposed to cease the T-34's production until the works on the T-34M were finished. The BT-7M's mass production should be resumed instead of the T-34's. For reasons which are unclear that proposal was rejected.

Features of the T-34 of STZ Factory.

On June 25, 1941, the SNK USSR and the Central Committee of the Communist Party issued a decree "About increasing the manufacturing of KV, T-34 and T-50 tanks, artillery tractors and tank diesel engines in the III and IV quarters of 1941" in which the task to form a complex Tank Industry was given. On July 1, 1941, GKO issued another decree #GKO-1ss which required the "Krasnoye Sormovo" factory #112 to join the production of T-34s. The factory was required to mount an M-17T petrol engine. Mass production of that engine must have been set up in one of the GAZ's workshops, before that it had produced aircraft engines. A decision to mount a petrol engine instead of diesel was temporary and was connected to shortage of V-2 engines: by that time the only factory #75 produced them, all other suppliers were evacuated so they were simply unable to produce anything. By November 1941 mass production of the V-2 was set up in the STZ factory, but by then factory #75 was "on wheels" being evacuated to the East, so the total output of diesel engines wasn't increased.

The production plan of the "Krasnoye Sormovo" supposed 750 "petrol" tanks to be produced until the end of the year. Unfortunately, it had completed only 173 tanks.

At the same time, the Factory #183 increased its output. Employees worked in two shifts (12 hours each). Production didn't cease even when the Germans bombed the factory.

T-34-76E with additional armor plates welded on turret and frontal hull. (M.Dmitriev)

TABLE 1. The manufacture of T-34s by the Factory #183 before evacuation. Month VII VIII IX X

Production 225 250 250 30

As shown in the table above, the very last tanks were assembled when the factory was partially destroyed or evacuated. Ordered by decree #667/SGKO which was dated September 12,1941, director of factory U.E.Maksarev started the evacuation process. On September 19, 1941, the first rail echelon had left Kharkov and set out for the Ural Mountains. Once in the new location, Nizhnij Tagil, a new factory was built in a very short time. It got its old number - #183. By December 1941, the new factory could produce 25 tanks using elements which were evacuated from Kharkov.

T-34 Model 1941 of the Factory #183. (E.Boldyrev)

Looking back on autumn 1941, I can confirm that the Stalingradsky Tractor Factory (STZ) was, in essence, the single serious T-34 manufacturer. Now it is understandable why most of STZ's suppliers were set up in Stalingrad as well: mainly to reduce the T-34's cost price and to increase the output of the STZ as much as possible. Armour plates were manufactured by the "Krasniy Oktyabr" factory ("Red October").

Hulls were manufactured by the Stalingradsky Dockyard (factory #264). In short, a full manufacturing industry was organised in one place, which is quite unusual for any complex industry.

In the first half of 1942, the T-34 was manufactured by three factories:

  • #183 (Nizhnij Tagil);

  • #112 "Krasnoye Sormovo" (former Gorkiy City); and

  • the Stalingradsky Tractor Factory (Stalingrad).

Tanks of these factories have similar technical characteristics but their details differed significantly.

T-34 Model 1941. South-Western Front. Summer 1942. (M.Dmitriev)

The new T-34 Model 1942 leaving the "Krasnoye Sormovo" Factory

Cast turret of the T-34 of the Factory #183 (M.Baryatinsky)

Since most suppliers were lost to the Germans, Soviet tank producers showed wonders of resourcefulness. For example, due to the loss of Dnepropetrovsk, the supply of gas-cylinders for engine emergency starting ceased. So the "Krasnoye Sormovo" used rejected cartridges from artillery shells.

In the STZ most of the welded details were replaced with cast because STZ had one of the best foundries in USSR. As the Germans advanced on Stalingrad, most of STZ's external supply lines had been cut off, rubber for instance. So the T-34s from the STZ had one specific feature: their road wheels didn't have a rubber tyre. Actually, by the end 1942, all other T-34 producers manufactured tanks with the same type of road wheels.

The factory in Stalingrad produced tanks until the Germans approached the factory's walls. Today we have an opportunity to imagine the conditions it worked in:

    "From the beginning of artillery bombardment and air strikes on the factory's territory, the Workshop #5 had done the following:

    1. manufactured 68 new tanks;

    2. repaired 23 tanks;

    3. furthermore, to help our Red Army to repair damaged tanks, a special brigade of skilled workers was formed; and

    4. the Red Army was constantly supplied with number of spare parts.

    In that period, the Workshop #5 was hit by five high explosive bombs, 154 incendiary bombs and one shell. The roof was heavily damaged and perforated many times. The gas-holder was burned out."

From October 5, 1942, according to an NKTP order, all works in the STZ were cancelled and employees evacuated. The rest of factory walls were wiped out during hot battles in Stalingrad.

Striving to compensate for the evident loss of the STZ, in June 1942, GOKO ordered Kirovsky factory in Chelyabinsk (ChKZ) to begin mass production of the T-34. The first tanks were ready by August 22. In March 1944, production of the T-34 by the ChKZ factory was cancelled.

The technical drawing of the pressed turret of the "Uralmash" Factory. 1942

Uralmash started mass production of hulls and turrets from April 1942 and supplied them to factory #183. In July 28, 1942, being ordered by GOKO's decree #2120, Uralmash then began mass production (assembling) of a whole T-34. The first tank was manufactured in September 1942. Constructors I.F.Varhushev and V.S.Arseniev developed a new pressed turret (see photo). From October 1942 to March 1944 Uralmash manufactured 2,050 of these turrets, and sent a significant number of those turrets to ChKZ. Uralmash did not manufacture the T-34 for very long. From August 1943, it switched to various SP guns which were based on the T-34's chassis.

In 1942, the Factory #174 was evacuated to Omsk, and launched T-34 mass production.

In August 1942, a new turret was developed. It had a hexagonal form, and all documents of that time named it "a turret of improved form". It was better then all previous turrets but still was very cramped. It had two rounded hatches instead of the previous "united" hatch. The turret also received an air ventilator that was mounted on the roof under the armoured cupola. Furthermore, the tank received an improved air filter "Cyclone", a 5-speed gearbox, and cylindrical external fuel tanks (up to four tanks, one of them always filled with oil, the rest were filled with fuel).

In summer 1943, the "Krasnoye Sormovo" had developed the new cast commander's cupola and began to mount it. Uralmash had proposed its own variant of a pressed commander's cupola, but it was rejected.

The cast hexagonal turret. Notice the unusual cast seam and lack of embrasures. (M.Baryatinsky)

T-34 was produced until mid-1944. Then it was replaced with its upgunned variant - the T-34-85.

The "Krasnoye Sormovo" also developed and produced 68 T-34-76 protected with anti-HEAT shields (skirts) like those on most of the German tanks. It supposed these skirts would protect them from German HEAT ammunition, but it wasn't checked. In the very first battle common 75 mm AP rounds destroyed most of those tanks. The idea was considered as hopeless and was abandoned.

T-34-76 Model 1942. South-Western Front, Kharkov area. March 1942. (M.Dmitriev)

The total production of the T-34-76

TABLE 2. Complete list of the T-34-76 manufacturers Designation Russian name English transcription City Прим.

#183 KhPZ Kharkovsky Parovozostroitelny Zavod Kharkov Steam-Engine Plant Kharkov Before autumn 1941

#183 UVZ Uralsky Vagonostroitelny Zavod Ural Rail-Car Plant Nizhnij Tagil There is KhPZ after evacuation in October 1941.

STZ Stalingradsky Tractorny Zavod Stalingrad Tractor Plant Stalingrad -

#112 "Krasnoye Sormovo" "Red Sormovo" Gorkij (today - Nizhnij Nivgorod) -

UTZM Uralsky Zavod Tyazhelogo Machinostroyeniya Ural Plant of Heavy Machine-Building Sverdlovsk -

ChKZ Chelyabinsky Kirovsky Zavod Kirov's Plant in Chelyabinsk Chelyabinsk There is Kirov's Plant after evacuation from Leningrad

#174 - - Omsk -

Fug

26-11-2006

lo podias haber trasladado al castellano en vez de al ingles. jej,

Pero hay  hay mucha informacion ok titus

TITUS20050

26-11-2006

Fug el articulo es muy extenso por eso puse la pagina que es muy importante para los vehiculos de combate rusos y traducir el articulo me llevaria mucho tiempo

Fug

27-11-2006

ya hombre, me referia con una pagina esa de autotraduccion, como WorldLingo.com o del estilo, gracias de todas formas.

TITUS20050

27-11-2006

Los traductores de idiomas automaticos traducencualquier cosa y muchas veses cuando el articulo es muy largo hay tanto que reescribir que es mejor traducirlo uno

MIGUEL WITTMAN

27-11-2006

Más cifras:

Entre junio de 1941 y diciembre de 1941, los rusos pierden 20.500 tanques.

Entre junio-41 y febrero-42, los alemanes pierden 3.402 tanques.

En todo 1942: Pérdidas---------URSS--15.000 // Alemania--2.648.-

Es decir por cada tanque alemán destruido, había 6 rusos.-

::) ::) ::)

                                   

TITUS20050

27-11-2006

Eso sucedio por que hasta fines de 1941 no aparecieron los T-34/76 que supero ampliamente a los Panzer III y la historia cambio radicalmente , lo que obligo a los alemanes a acelerar la puesta en combate del Panzer IV

Haz login o regístrate para participar